sudipta Amitava-da Thank you for the review. You have said whatever you felt after the watching the play and I appreciate it. However I feel that I need to respond to some of your comments not as a member of the production team but as a playwright. 1. You commented - “But in these days of cheap airlines tickets and cheaper communication cost can anyone be so unaware and acting so taken aback of the changes going on particularly for a person having purchased a place of residence there during the intervening years Where has he been ” Do you think all of us visit our home in India every year Here is an email comment from one of our audience: “….I appreciated it more because I went to India in May after 11 years.” Parijat went back home after 8 years. But even when I visit India every year or every other year the social changes keeps on amazing me. Yes we are aware of the changes but when it starts affecting you personally it hits home. I am sure you feel it too. If not I’d say that you are in denial. Some of us do try to pretend that they are abreast of what’s going on back home they even appear to appreciate some of the social changes to prove their liberal mindset - but deep within it hurts them too - it hurts when you find your home is no more. One of our western audience member told me his mother used to say - “there is no home ” I was almost in tears. 2. “Message is not clear though at times it looks like telling us that it is all right even laudable to acquire HIV virus provided the cause is right.” How could you get this distorted message that the play is trying to say that it is “laudable to acquire HIV” The only message if any one could conclude is that HIV can attack us from any front - one need not visit brothels or use infected needles or get transfused with contaminated blood. Just to let you know that the Suranjana character is not entirely fictitious. It is based on real life character. Careless saintly behavior like some health care workers or unprotected romance can cause this virus to infect - because the virus does not care whether the body they are attacking is that of a saint or a romantic lover or a criminal rapist. But each such case can be a story - a story in its own right. Suranjana and Pallab’s story is also a story - please don’t humiliate it by saying that it seemed it is laudable to acquire HIV for the right cause. I felt that without the presence of the character Suranjana Pallab’s story would have been incomplete and it would have been unfair to Pallab and many other young men and women. Pallab never tried to give any excuse for his predicament but that should not be misinterpreted in anyway. The story may draw some sympathy for Pallab and Suranjana - but I don’t know how it can be interpreted as being an effort to glorify the acquisition of this deadly disease 3. “The doctor expert on AIDS treatment uttered not so much of a word about anti-retroviral drug. ” Dr. Parijat Sen did mention - “HIV is no longer a death sentence” and also mentioned several times that drugs are now available that can hold of HIV for long periods. Although he did not mention David Ho or Bill Gates or go into the details of anti-retroviral cocktail or HAART therapy - it was not the treatment of HIV/AIDS the issue here - at least to him or his brothers family. It was well established in the play that access to treatment is not the key problem in India or Calcutta - although not all hospitals would admit an HIV patient even today. As per the recent reports many HIV patients do not seek medical treatment because they are afraid that doing so would expose their HIV status and they would be social outcasts. Also you must be aware that anti-retrovirals are not cures - they just happen to hold it off for some time and the time varies from person to person and the quality of care he/she is receiving. One of the key problems in India is that the patients do not continue their treatment and thus develop resistance to the medications. 4. “On this subject at least India is not far out of step with the rest of the world and this is a wrong issue to depict the primitiveness and heartlessness of our people which appears to be the subtext of the story. ” Although HIV is still considered a stigma in some western countries but it is not the same as it was during the seventies or the eighties. The HIV stigma in the west is associated with homosexuality I’d recommend Tony Kushner’s “Angels in America” and the west’s homophobia. With the wider acceptance of homosexuals in this country the stigma associated with HIV has lost its sting in many ways. However in India the HIV stigma is associated more with sexual morality - besides the undue fear of infection. Before writing this play and even before staging this play I have read countless episodes of social cruelty in India towards HIV patients. Even a current running serial novel in “Desh” patrika was writing about this issue. After watching the play another audience member pointed me to this article - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Kolkata-/Neighbours-thrash-HIV-patient/articleshow/4626142.cms A recent August 2008 report said that a bill of rights for HIV patients that was presented to the govt in August 2006 is yet to reach the parliament. Amitava-da denial is not going to help us. Yes “the apathy towards HIV is not typical of Calcutta or India” - but I am an Indian and that is what I can write about. I cannot write about what happens in Indonesia. We had several non-Indian audience and they did extract the universality of the issue. I am sorry that you felt that I was unfairly critical of India. I just wanted to tell a story through this play - a large part of which are based on facts and my own feelings. http://nynjbengali.com http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/Kolkata-/Neighbours-thrash-HIV-patient/articleshow/4626142.cms